An image of Bea Bea Chu-Chu in the studio by Harrison Marks and from an original negative. Interestingly I first thought this was a retouched or censored shot, but as it’s straight from the untouched negative, maybe not? The reason for the question was that in all her other shots she is showing off her very natural dark pussy, whereas here it seems to have gone?
After careful study, I’m still not sure what has happened, you can clearly see hair, but not to the extent of her other shots and it seems almost white? Maybe they powdered it with makeup or something, god knows why or maybe they did something to the area in developing the negative? It certainly looks different that’s for sure, but Bea Bea sure does have a fabulous curvy figure and big round tits, all that distract you in a nice way 🙂
Looks a bit like stubble, perhaps growing back after a shave. Wrong colour though, unless she dyed it!!