Bea Bea Chu-Chu taken by Harrison Marks in one of the bay windows at his flat in 1969. A fabulous view of both Bea Bea’s figure and out the window, but I know which I prefer to look at. She does have rather a larger pair of tits on her, not Paula Page large but still large. Though I don’t think they stand out as much because they still look in proportion with the rest of her curvy figure, plus there’s not a lot of sag in this pair! Great figure and hips, as well as the natural look below, although not overly hairy compared to some!
An image of Bea Bea Chu-Chu in the studio by Harrison Marks and from an original negative. Interestingly I first thought this was a retouched or censored shot, but as it’s straight from the untouched negative, maybe not? The reason for the question was that in all her other shots she is showing off her very natural dark pussy, whereas here it seems to have gone?
After careful study, I’m still not sure what has happened, you can clearly see hair, but not to the extent of her other shots and it seems almost white? Maybe they powdered it with makeup or something, god knows why or maybe they did something to the area in developing the negative? It certainly looks different that’s for sure, but Bea Bea sure does have a fabulous curvy figure and big round tits, all that distract you in a nice way 🙂